Courageous Becoming: Cultivating Ethicality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62882/47adx108Keywords:
ethicality, developmental ethics, coaching psychology, intentionality, reflective practiceAbstract
Courageous Becoming is a developmental model of ethical practice for coaches, mentors, and leaders. As ethical tensions intensify across professional landscapes, practitioners require more than compliance, they need ways of engaging that support real-time ethical responsiveness. In contrast to static, compliance-driven approaches, it positions ethicality as a lived, relational, and mature way of being. The model outlines eight interdependent movements—Context & Culture, Lived Values, Nourishment, Networks of Strength, Embodied Presence, Intentional Agency, Discernment, and Praxis in Motion; each representing a dimension of ethical development involving reflection, intentionality, and relational awareness.
The model supports practitioners in engaging with real-world ethical complexity—not by prescribing answers, but by cultivating the inner capacities required to respond with presence, courage, and integrity. Integrated with the Praxis Model—a reflective framework for navigating ethical tension in real time—Courageous Becoming also supports the ongoing development of ethical awareness and presence across all aspects of practice.
Together, they offer a psychologically informed and philosophically anchored framework for cultivating ethicality as a way of being: in practice, in relationship, and across the arc of a professional life.
References
Bachkirova, T. (2016). The self in coaching: Conceptualization and understanding. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 9(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2016.1186709
Biswas-Diener, R. (2012). The courage quotient: How science can make you braver. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
Cushman, F., Young, L., & Greene, J. D. (2010). Multi-system moral psychology. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 47–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-003
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Feldman, D. B., & Dreher, D. E. (2012). Can hope be changed in 90 minutes? Testing the efficacy of a single-session goal-pursuit intervention for college students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 745–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9292-4
Flett, G. L. (2018). The psychology of mattering: Understanding the human need to be significant. Academic Press.
Flett, G. L., & Zangeneh, M. (2020). Mattering as a vital support for people during the COVID-19 pandemic: The benefits of feeling and knowing that someone cares during times of crisis. Journal of Concurrent Disorders, 2(1), 106–123.
Gallagher, M. W., & Lopez, S. J. (2009). Positive expectancies and mental health: Identifying the unique contributions of hope and optimism. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 548–556.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.
Greene, J. D. (2008). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 3. The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development (pp. 35–80). MIT Press.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2015). The relationships of character strengths with coping, work-related stress, and job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 165.
Hursthouse, R. (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.
McLoughlin, S. (2025). The four pillars of Practical Wisdom Coaching. The Coaching Psychologist, 20(3), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpstcp.2025.20.3.19
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Narvaez, D. (2008). Human flourishing and moral development: Cognitive and neurobiological perspectives of virtue development. In L.
Nucci & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Handbook of moral and character education (pp. 310–327). Routledge.
Niemiec, R. M. (2013). VIA character strengths: Research and practice (The first 10 years). In H. H. Knoop & A. Delle Fave (Eds.), Well-being and cultures: Perspectives from positive psychology (pp. 11–29). Springer.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press.
Prilleltensky, I. (2020). Mattering at the intersection of psychology, philosophy, and politics. American Journal of Community Psychology, 65(1–2), 16–34.
Ramage, M., & Shipp, K. (2020). Ludwig von Bertalanffy. In Systems thinkers (2nd ed., pp. 53–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7475-2_6
Rego, A., Simpson, A. V., Bluhm, D. J., & Cunha, M. P. e. (2025). Are morally courageous leaders more effective? Journal of Business Research, 162, 114310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114310
Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education, 29(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240020015001
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2018). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 475–486.
Smith, W.A. (2024). Identity: Shifting sands of the becoming of a coach. Journal of Coaching Ethics, 1(9). https://doi.org/10.62882/tb3b6j37
Smith, W.A. (2025). The intentional coach: Bridging intentionality and ethicality. Journal of Coaching Ethics, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.62882/m8cjnh07
Smith, W.A., McCarthy, S., & Rosefield, M. (2025). Positive psychology coaching: Embodying wellbeing and ethicality. Journal of Coaching Ethics, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.62882/48dea944
Smith, W.A., & Arnold, C. (2023). Ethical coaching and its relationships. In W.-A. Smith, E. Turner, J. Passmore, Y.-L. Lai, & D. Clutterbuck (Eds.), The ethical coaches’ handbook: A guide to developing ethical maturity in practice (pp. x–x). Routledge.
Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275.
Snyder, C. R., Ilardi, S., Cheavens, J., Michael, S. T., Yamhure, L., & Sympson, S. (1991). The role of hope in cognitive-behavior therapies. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15(6), 527–538.
Tronto, J. C. (1993/2020). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003070672
Tudor, K. (2024). The courage to be, to become – and to belong: A person-centered understanding. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 23(4), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779757.2023.2234985
Wilson, D., Ng, V., Alonso, N., Jeffrey, A., & Tay, L. (2024). Conceptualizing “positive attributes” across psychological perspectives. Journal of Personality, 92(3), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12873
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wendy-Ann Smith
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Published open access under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND). This license permits others to share the work with proper attribution, for non-commercial purposes only, and without any modifications.
